Why Obama Shouldn’t Give Up His Blackberry
November 17, 2008
This morning I happened upon this AP story from CNN.com where the author suggested President-Elect Obama may have to give up his Blackberry handheld because his emails could be subpoenaed and made public, not to mention the fact that consumer cell devices are rather easily tracked. As a technology expert and enthusiast, I have to take issue this this arguement.
The rule of thumb for corporate America is simple: do not put anything in a work email that you wouldn’t want to appear on the front page of The New York Times. The same should hold true for any public official utilizing “official” equipment. While there are matters of national security to take into consideration, but most electronics manufacturers (let alone contractors to the Department of Defense) offer secure encrypted versions of their regular products for official use. Research in Motion (RIM), the company behind the popular Blackberry handheld offers a secure version of their product.
In the end, it really comes down to judgement. People should not be afraid to use these technologies They just need to include common sense with their execution. It would be a shame fore the President-Elect to cease using his productivity-boosting devices. His campaign was revolutionary in its communications methods to its supporters, leveraging the best in social media (Twitter & Facebook) and email marketing. This is a key ingredient in this day and age if his administration whishes to contiune the transparency they’ve touted throughout the campaign.
One key security issue I will agree with is cell signal triangulation. However, one would think that the military would have figured out ways around that. After all, that’s their job.
When not to rely on SEO
October 23, 2008
While investing in SEO in today’s market can be one of the most cost-effective and import things a business can do, there are certain cases where it may not be ideal. As discussed over on searchengineguide.com:
If you have created a completely new product that serves a completely new niche, there simply may not be enough people searching for it to make search marketing efforts worthwhile. If this is the case, you’d do far better to spend your money engaging a good public relations firm or working on a social media strategy that will help you break into the marketplace by engaging your customers in the places where they have conversations. You’ll have to educate them before you have any shot at selling to them.
Akin to balancing your financial portfolio, its important to properly balance your marketing strategy. Sure, SEO can be incredibly impactful, but its not a magic bullet. Its critical to perform the necessary market reserach to best determine how much search volume there is about your particular area and what the best course of marketing a promotion should be in your case.
ROI on SEO vs. PPC
October 21, 2008
Just as savvy investors see opportunity in down markets, internet marketers and SEO experts do the same when they notice a disproportion in spending on PPC (pay-per-click) advertising compared to SEO. The often referenced “Google Heat Map” indicates that the lion-share of clicks for search results are within the organic listings. That said, recent reports show PPC spending is over ten times the amount invested in SEO and organic search. So what does this mean?
PPC is an expensive band-aid.
While it may drive traffic to your site, the chances of false positives resulting in no sales conversion is much higher than if organic search results bring traffic to your site based on proper SEO and good site content. Since so many folks are focusing on the easy PPC fix and not concentrating on what really matters in the long run, they will lose their ability to compete effectively as other website become more SEO-aware.
In these uncertain economic times, it is critically important for businesses to invest in proper SEO in order to ensure their ability to be competive in the search engine space both today and tomorrow.
Google and Dynamic URL Rewrites for SEO
September 23, 2008
The general consensus in the SEO world has held that search engine friendly static URLs are indexed more effectively than complicated database-driven (and seemingly nonsensical) dynamic URLs. However, according to a recent post on Google’s Wemaster Blog, that assumption is not exactly accurate. As most major websites today are based on database driven content management systems, it would be completely impractical to rewrite and manage all URLs so that they would appear to be static. To that point, attempts at such URL rewrites may actually hide information from Googlebot that otherwise could have assisted in the indexing process. While URL rewrites can be beneficial to the end-user experience (those pages to tend to have higher click-through rates), they are no longer required as Googlebot has become much more capable at well-indexing those database driven dynamic URLs.
The following in an excerpt that addresses certain dynamic URL’s myths with respect to Google:
Myth: “Dynamic URLs cannot be crawled.”
Fact: We can crawl dynamic URLs and interpret the different parameters. We might have problems crawling and ranking your dynamic URLs if you try to make your urls look static and in the process hide parameters which offer the Googlebot valuable information. One recommendation is to avoid reformatting a dynamic URL to make it look static. It’s always advisable to use static content with static URLs as much as possible, but in cases where you decide to use dynamic content, you should give us the possibility to analyze your URL structure and not remove information by hiding parameters and making them look static.
Myth: “Dynamic URLs are okay if you use fewer than three parameters.”
Fact: There is no limit on the number of parameters, but a good rule of thumb would be to keep your URLs short (this applies to all URLs, whether static or dynamic). You may be able to remove some parameters which aren’t essential for Googlebot and offer your users a nice looking dynamic URL. If you are not able to figure out which parameters to remove, we’d advise you to serve us all the parameters in your dynamic URL and our system will figure out which ones do not matter. Hiding your parameters keeps us from analyzing your URLs properly and we won’t be able to recognize the parameters as such, which could cause a loss of valuable information.
Following are some questions we thought you might have at this point.
Does that mean I should avoid rewriting dynamic URLs at all?
That’s our recommendation, unless your rewrites are limited to removing unnecessary parameters, or you are very diligent in removing all parameters that could cause problems. If you transform your dynamic URL to make it look static you should be aware that we might not be able to interpret the information correctly in all cases. If you want to serve a static equivalent of your site, you might want to consider transforming the underlying content by serving a replacement which is truly static. One example would be to generate files for all the paths and make them accessible somewhere on your site. However, if you’re using URL rewriting (rather than making a copy of the content) to produce static-looking URLs from a dynamic site, you could be doing harm rather than good. Feel free to serve us your standard dynamic URL and we will automatically find the parameters which are unnecessary.
Launch of Search Engine CUIL Premature?
July 28, 2008
The internet has been abuzz with the news of a new search engine created by former Google engineers called CUIL today. It offers a new interface and a new take on search, sporting its own algorhythm. However, a few quick searches reveal deep holes in CUIL’s index coverage. Not only is it lacking key data in its search results, questions arise with respect to its search’s hierarchy. For example, the very first result for “Pete Lacis” brings a old, but hardly ever used domain of mine where there is much more relevant and valuable information to be found for the same search in Google and Yahoo. Time will tell if CUIL has any competitive power in this market. I would expect for over 30 million in venture capital funding, the search results to be a little more compelling.
How to Improve Traffic with Micro-blogging
July 24, 2008
One of the most popular off-shoots of the Web 2.0 space has been the advent of micro-blogging. This capability enables users to post short “updates” (usually no more than 140 characters long) in lieu of lengthy blog posts and has means to share this information within a specific community or the internet at large. While this can be as simple as status updates on the popular social networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace, there’s more to it than just that. Micro-blogging sites such as Twitter, Pownce and Plurk take things further and enable users to embed url’s and rich media items (pictures, music, video, etc).
However, just because you have these new capabilities doesn’t mean you’re going to generate SEO gold. You have to know how to author your content properly.
When promoting url’s via micro-blogging, its important to give the link context as concisely as possible without coming across has being spammy. Use these resources to share things that you think others will find useful or entertaining. If you’re promoting a product or service, position the link so that it comes accross as being useful or entertaining to others.
So if you’re going to mention that you really like the content of a particular site, be sure to mention “why” so that your post has context so that Google, Yahoo and the other search engines have something they can sink their crawler’s “teeth” into.
WordPress 2.6 Upgrade Available
July 15, 2008
For all those WordPress users out there, be certain to upgrade to version 2.6 which is out today. WordPress is certainly a favorite blog/cms platform of ours, for its ease of use it matched equally by its search engine optimization friendly design.
Be sure to check out this video about all the new features and improvments as well as upgrade instructions. Remember to backup your existing web files and database BEFORE you upgrade!
Google, Yahoo to Index (some) Flash
July 1, 2008
With the announcement that Adobe was providing optimized Flash Player technolgoy to Google and Yahoo, the SEO community has been a buzz about what this could mean for the industry. Until now, practically all content located within a flash or shockwave file has been invisible to search engines. The news here is that this new technology would enable search engines to read some text elements within flash….but any graphical text would still be invisible to search engines (save for ALT Text descriptions).
Phaseous on Fox Business
June 25, 2008
Phaseous is featured in this article on Fox Business by Nancy Colasurdo. This piece is a great representation of our approach to branding, site building and optimization.
http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/personal-finance/web-site/
Internet Anonymity
June 23, 2008
During the days of the early Internet (web 1.0 as some refer to it), as soon as folks were able to get online they began searching for and participating in the discussion of special interests (such as playing electric guitar) that mirrored their passions. Due to the limitations of technology of the day (i.e. number of characters, folks with similar names, etc), this Web 1.0 world was full of creative and sometimes auto-generated screenames (like johnny6785). A side effect of these limitations gave birth to the dawn of Internet Anonymity where folks could act as they wished online without much fear of having their true identities revealed.
Fast forward a few years. That small discussion board that a person has been contributing too since 1999 has grown dramatically in both number of visitors and depth of content. On the net, johnny6785 has positioned himself as a guru within the realm of all things electric guitar. The Internet has made it possible for him to connect with folks around the globe and develop his online reputation. One problem though……who exactly is johnny6785?
Phaseous Phact: Since everything we do on the Internet arguably will remain there forever, its important to use your real name (or corporate identity) if you wish to positively participate in the disucssion and develop your online reputation.